REsults

Work Package 1

Developing candidate reference materials for reliable nanomedicine measurements

WP1 developed and characterised a diverse portfolio of metal oxide, multi-element and silica nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles and liposomes. Feedback between material producers and measurement partners helped refine batches, select candidates and test their homogeneity, stability and measurand-specific performance.

One key lesson A useful reference material must be fit for a defined measurement purpose. A material can be reproducible and stable yet remain unsuitable if its complexity prevents robust, traceable value assignment.
A reference material vial connected to a roadmap of measurement and validation steps
7candidate systems assessed
2prioritised for SAXS reference use
1open SAXS dataset and analysis workflow
1Academy replay
01

Our results Materials, evidence and future directions for reliable nanomedicine measurements

Flagship result

Two systems prioritised for SAXS particle-size reference use

WP1 used production evidence and cross-partner measurements to assess seven candidate systems and identify the two with the clearest route towards further development for a defined SAXS particle-size use.

  • Two priority candidates: BAM-IONP10 and BAM-UCNP20 emerged as the strongest candidates for future SAXS particle-size reference use.
  • Measurand-specific evidence: no significant between-unit variability was detected for the assessed SAXS measurand, while SAXS and TEM supported primary-particle-size stability over the assessed period.
  • Quantified SAXS performance: D2 estimated expanded relative size uncertainties at approximately 5% for BAM-IONP10 and 6% for BAM-UCNP20, corresponding to approximately 95% confidence under the study assumptions.
Transmission electron microscopy image of the BAM-IONP10 candidate system
TEM image · Source: METRINO D2, Fig. 3.2.3; BAM
BAM-IONP10 Citrate-stabilised iron oxide nanoparticles
Intended use
SAXS particle-size measurements
Size uncertainty
Approximately 5% expanded relative uncertainty (k = 2)
Evidence
No significant between-unit variability detected for the assessed SAXS measurand; primary particle size stable over the assessed period
Transmission electron microscopy image of the BAM-UCNP20 candidate system
TEM image · Source: METRINO D2, Fig. 3.1.3; BAM
BAM-UCNP20 Citrate-stabilised upconverting multi-element nanoparticles
Intended use
SAXS particle-size measurements
Size uncertainty
Approximately 6% expanded relative uncertainty (k = 2)
Evidence
No significant between-unit variability detected for the assessed SAXS measurand; primary particle size stable by SAXS and TEM over the assessed period

Important limitations: DLS indicated aggregation-related changes in the hydrodynamic size of BAM-UCNP20, although SAXS and TEM did not show changes in primary particle size. No aggregation was detected for BAM-IONP10 by DLS over the assessed period. Particle number concentration carried substantially larger uncertainties, and extended stability studies were still in progress when D2 was submitted on 27 March 2026.

From identity to evidence These D2 figures combine TEM imaging with the between-unit homogeneity assessments reported for the two prioritised candidate systems. They document the specific evidence generated in WP1; they do not confer certified reference material status or establish public material availability.
TEM image and between-unit homogeneity assessment reported for BAM-IONP10
BAM-IONP10TEM and between-unit homogeneity assessment. Source: METRINO D2, Figure 3.2.3; BAM.
TEM image and between-unit homogeneity assessment reported for BAM-UCNP20
BAM-UCNP20TEM and between-unit homogeneity assessment. Source: METRINO D2, Figure 3.1.3; BAM.
Explore three related D1 characterisation figures from the broader WP1 portfolio

Scope note: these figures illustrate the broader characterisation work documented in D1. They are not presented as images of BAM-IONP10 or BAM-UCNP20, and no equivalence with those two prioritised candidate systems should be inferred.

TEM and particle-size characterisation of oleate-capped iron oxide nanoparticles
Oleate-capped FexOy nanoparticlesTEM and particle-size characterisation. Source: METRINO D1, Figure 3.2.1.
TEM and particle-size characterisation of citrate-capped iron oxide nanoparticles
Citrate-capped FexOy nanoparticlesTEM and particle-size characterisation. Source: METRINO D1, Figure 3.2.2.
Coating, TEM, particle-size and DLS characterisation of multi-element nanoparticles
Multi-element nanoparticlesCoating, TEM, particle-size and DLS characterisation. Source: METRINO D1, Figure 3.5.1.
Open evidence available now The Zenodo record contains Empa’s contribution to the SAXS interlaboratory work: raw and corrected data, MATLAB scripts and fitting results. It is not the consolidated dataset from every participant.
Explore the Empa SAXS dataset and analysis workflow
Candidate systems — public material provision not announced
Scientific publication

FeraSpin™ R: a product-relevant case study

The FeraSpin™ R work shows why a scientifically valuable nanomedicine model is not automatically the easiest candidate for metrologically traceable reference use.

Peer-reviewed · open access · 2026

Effect of sampling volume on measurements of size and chemical homogeneity of MRI contrast agent FeraSpin™ R

The study examined how the volume and analytical scale sampled can affect conclusions about particle size and chemical homogeneity in a complex iron oxide nanoparticle system.

It provides a strong scientific case study for nanomedicine characterisation while also illustrating why broad or aggregated particle-size distributions make robust, traceable SAXS value assignment more demanding than for more uniform systems.

Journal: Nanoscale Advances 8 (2026), 3136–3150 DOI: 10.1039/D5NA00463B
Scientific case-study value A relevant model for investigating size, composition and homogeneity across analytical scales.
Reference-material suitability Complexity and polydispersity can limit the practicality of traceable value assignment for a defined measurand.
Resources

Roadmap and project deliverables

The public roadmap translates WP1 evidence into future priorities. D1 and D2 document the candidate portfolio and the subsequent homogeneity, stability and uncertainty work, but no public download is offered here unless an official public record is confirmed.

Strategic output Public roadmap

Nanomedicine Reference Material Roadmap

Published open resource Strategic priorities, evidence gaps and realistic routes towards future reference-material development
What will you find in the roadmap?

The roadmap turns WP1 evidence into a practical sequence of priorities for nanomedicine reference material development. It clarifies what can be used or explored now, which material and measurement gaps need further work, and when the evidence could justify a longer-term RM or CRM route. It is a prioritisation tool, not a catalogue of certified materials.

It also explains a central trade-off: uniform particles are easier to characterise with traceable methods, while real nanomedicines are often more complex, polydisperse, proprietary or sensitive to storage and dilution. The roadmap uses that trade-off to frame realistic next steps.

Document date: final version, 11 June 2026 Published on Zenodo: 6 July 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21227912 Licence: CC BY 4.0

Availability status: the roadmap is public. A sustainable public provision route for BAM-IONP10 and BAM-UCNP20 has not yet been confirmed.

Deliverable D1 Technical report

Report on the synthesis and characterisation of synthetic lipid-based and metal oxide nanoparticles

Project deliverable submitted Official public access not yet confirmed
What will you find in D1?
  • The preparation and initial characterisation of the material portfolio distributed across METRINO.
  • Metal oxide, multi-element and silica nanoparticles, mRNA- and siRNA-loaded LNPs, and liposomes.
  • Synthesis routes and initial measurements used to support further candidate selection.
Submitted: 30 November 2024 Document type: Technical report Public access: not yet confirmed
How can you use D1?
  • Understand how the starting material portfolio was established.
  • Compare production and batch-release characterisation approaches.
  • Identify the material features that guided selection for further measurement, homogeneity and stability studies.
D1 submitted — official public record to be confirmed
Deliverable D2 Technical report

Report on the stability and homogeneity studies of selected candidate reference materials

Project deliverable submitted Official public access not yet confirmed
What will you find in D2?
  • Homogeneity and stability studies for seven selected systems.
  • Links between each material, its relevant measurands and the methods used.
  • Evidence on particle size, particle number concentration, chemical composition and surface charge, with uncertainty estimates where possible.
Submitted: 27 March 2026 Document type: Technical report Public access: not yet confirmed
How can you use D2?
  • Assess candidate suitability for a specific measurand and method.
  • Plan homogeneity and stability assessments.
  • Understand why evidence for one material property may not support another.
D2 submitted — official public record to be confirmed
02

Learn from the experts How purpose, measurands and evidence shape reference material development

How a candidate becomes a useful measurement tool

WP1 showed that reference material development is a sequence of linked decisions. The route starts with the measurement need, not with a material that happens to be available.

1. Define the intended use Specify the measurement, comparison or performance check that the material should support and who needs it.
2. Match material, measurand and method Select a system whose composition, size distribution and physical state allow the relevant property to be measured reliably.
3. Build the evidence Assess between-unit homogeneity, stability, uncertainty and method performance for the intended measurand.
4. Choose a realistic route to use Decide whether the evidence supports a reference test material, quality control sample, RM or longer-term CRM development.

The final route must also account for demand, production capacity, intellectual property, cost and long-term availability.

Surface chemistry makes this logic especially visible: the “surface” is not a single universal value. The measurand, signal-generation principle, sample preparation, validation strategy and intended decision must be considered together. Academy 5 shows how experts apply this purpose-first approach.

METRINO Academy

Unlocking Surface Chemistry in Nanomedicine

Presented by Dr Ute Resch-Genger, BAM.

40+registrations
15countries represented
>8.5/10participant satisfaction
What you will learn in this webinar
  • How to define a surface chemistry measurand before selecting a method.
  • How signal-generation principles and sample preparation shape the result.
  • How intended use and uncertainty requirements influence the level of validation needed.
“If you know what you want, this could save you a lot of time.” Dr Ute Resch-Genger, METRINO Academy Session 5
03

What WP1 taught us From technical feasibility to realistic reference material strategies

METRINO aimed to make measurements more reliable and useful for nanomedicine. WP1 addressed the material foundation of that challenge: producing nanomedicine-relevant systems, characterising them, and determining which could support a clearly defined measurement purpose.

From WP1 evidence to practical consequences

What the work showed Candidate selection is iterative.

D1 records a feedback loop between material producers and measurement partners. Characterisation results informed new batches and helped narrow the candidate portfolio.

Why it matters Production and measurement development must progress together.

A material cannot be selected only from its formulation or manufacturing data. Its suitability depends on how well the intended measurands can be assigned.

What the work showed The most representative material is not always the best reference candidate.

FeraSpin™ R provided a product-relevant case study, but its complexity made robust, traceable SAXS size assignment particularly demanding.

Why it matters Metrological tractability must be weighed against clinical realism.

More uniform systems such as BAM-IONP10 and BAM-UCNP20 offer a practical foundation for establishing traceable measurements before more complex formulations can be addressed.

What the work showed Homogeneity and stability conclusions are measurand-specific.

BAM-UCNP20 showed changes in hydrodynamic size by DLS, while its primary particle size remained stable by SAXS and TEM.

Why it matters A candidate cannot simply be labelled “stable”.

The measurand, method and conditions must accompany the conclusion so users understand exactly which property remained stable and which did not.

What the work showed Production feasibility alone does not establish reference suitability.

A candidate must combine producibility with measurand-specific homogeneity, stability and a realistic route to robust value assignment.

Why it matters Effort should follow both evidence and achievable impact.

WP1 redirected advanced evaluation towards candidates with more uniform size distributions and a more realistic path to metrologically traceable use.

04

From results to community use Practical routes to reproduce, interpret and extend the WP1 evidence

Three ways to use and extend the WP1 results

The open dataset, publication, roadmap and Academy replay can already support analysis, planning and training. The candidate materials and non-public deliverables require a separately confirmed access route.

  • Reproduce and compare the open SAXS analysis. Use the Empa data, MATLAB scripts and fitting results to reproduce the deposited workflow and examine how analysis choices affect the reported SAXS result.
  • Design future reference-test routes around a defined use. Use the public roadmap to connect intended use, measurand, evidence, demand and sustainable provision. Add D1 or D2 only if an official public version becomes available.
  • Train teams to separate relevance from reference suitability. Combine the FeraSpin™ R case study and Academy 5 to show why homogeneity, stability and surface chemistry conclusions always depend on the measurand, method and decision.

What is not available yet: BAM-IONP10 and BAM-UCNP20 remain candidate systems. A sustainable public provision route has not been confirmed, and no public link to D1 or D2 is provided without an official authorised record.

WP1 scientific contact
Dr Ute Resch-Genger

Dr Ute Resch-Genger

WP1 leader, BAM

Head of the Biophotonics Division at BAM, with expertise in optical metrology, surface chemistry, nanoparticle characterisation and reference material development.

Built through collaboration

Organisations contributing materials, measurements or data analysis documented in D1 and D2

The grid reflects organisations documented as contributors to D1 and D2.

Metrology for Innovative Nanotherapeutics
Get Social

The METRINO project has received funding from the European Partnership on Metrology (Grant #22HLT04), co-financed from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme and by the Participating States. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or EURAMET. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

© 2026 — The METRINO Project