SAXS
Determine particle size using laboratory or synchrotron SAXS
- Measures
- Mean diameter and size distribution
- Applied to
- Polydisperse iron oxide nanoparticles
Deliverable D3 · Section 4.1
Useful Resources
METRINO practical resources
This page brings together METRINO project results, practical guidance for finding the right method, and selected external standards and protocol resources.
Check the scope before use or reuse. Each procedure was developed or evaluated with specific materials, matrices and model systems. Always verify its scope, conditions and limitations in the linked deliverable before applying it to a new system.
01 · METRINO project results
Choose the pathway that best matches your sample and measurement question. The linked deliverables remain the authoritative source for every method’s scope, conditions and limitations.
Pathway 1
Filter the catalogue by measurement need. Each card identifies the technique, the materials used to develop or test the procedure, and its section in the D3 good practice guide. D3 also contains broader decision tables: a method or material listed in those tables does not necessarily have a dedicated SOP.
SAXS
Deliverable D3 · Section 4.1
SAXS
Deliverable D3 · Section 4.2
Open calculation notebookAFM + SEM
Deliverable D3 · Section 4.3
MD-AF4
Deliverable D3 · Section 4.4
DLS
Deliverable D3 · Section 4.5
TGA
Deliverable D3 · Section 5.1
ATR-FTIR
Deliverable D3 · Section 5.2
XPS
Deliverable D3 · Section 5.3
qNMR
Deliverable D3 · Section 5.4
Pathway 2
Start with the sample and liquid matrix, then choose an analytical workflow that fits the nanoparticle system and measurement question. For cells, tissues or tissue phantoms, continue to Pathway 3.
Step 1
D5 provides procedures for spiking, extraction and fractionation in matrices of increasing complexity.
Review sample preparationStep 2
D6 describes five fractionation, characterisation and direct-analysis workflows for specific nanoparticle classes.
Find an analytical workflowD6 reports validation and performance evidence for selected fractionation methods. It also includes a complementary SAXS good-practice workflow, which is not presented as a rigid SOP.
MD-AF4
Deliverable D6 · Section 5.1
MD-AF4
Deliverable D6 · Section 5.2
MD-AF4
Deliverable D6 · Section 5.3
SEC-MALS
Deliverable D6 · Section 5.4
SAXS
Deliverable D6 · Section 5.5
Pathway 3
Use D7 to identify protocols for preparing biological and synthetic model systems and for measuring nanoparticle uptake or distribution. Use D8 to understand how selected orthogonal techniques performed in the internal interlaboratory comparison.
Epoxy phantom
Deliverable D7 · Preparation protocol
3D tissue model
Deliverable D7 · Preparation protocol
Cartilage model
Deliverable D7 · Preparation protocol
Histology
Deliverable D7 · Tissue preparation workflow
LA-ICP-TOF-MS
Deliverable D7 · Analytical SOP
scICP-MS
Deliverable D7 · Analytical SOP
Digestion + ICP-OES
Deliverable D7 · Analytical SOP
TPEF
Deliverable D7 · Imaging SOP
ToF-SIMS
Deliverable D7 · Imaging SOP
Inverted light microscopy
Deliverable D7 · Imaging protocol
The internal ILC compared complementary approaches across increasing biological complexity. It supports method selection and exposes practical limits; it does not make every method interchangeable or universally validated. Version 1 · published 30 April 2026 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21641447 · CC BY 4.0.
Key interpretation: D8 correlated TPEF, LA-ICP-MS and ToF-SIMS data through a custom image-registration pipeline and found good agreement between LA-ICP-MS and bulk ICP-MS for HfO₂ uptake. Single-cell ICP-MS remained challenging because of low transport efficiency and cell disruption during injection. These limitations should guide reuse.
Before using a METRINO procedure
A procedure is one part of a reliable measurement workflow. Before applying it to a new system, confirm that the measurement question, sample, controls and reporting requirements are appropriate.
The dimensions reported depend on the workflow and evidence available.
Beyond METRINO
Explore trusted standards bodies, pharmacopoeial resources and complementary protocol libraries relevant to nanomedicine measurement.

The 30-second version
Think of an SOP as a carefully written recipe for a defined measurement. Protocols and good-practice guides can add context and choices. A formal standard goes further: it is developed through an organised consensus process.
The key point: METRINO produced procedures and technical evidence. These may support future standardisation, but they are not themselves formal standards.
From a project result to wider consensus
A documented procedure can support comparative evidence and technical discussion. Formal standardisation still requires an independent consensus and adoption process.
This pathway is not automatic and does not imply that a METRINO procedure has already been adopted as a formal standard.
Use these entry points to explore technical committees, test guidance, interlaboratory pathways and pharmacopoeial information.
Complement the METRINO deliverables with established assay collections, methods manuals and measurement guidance from trusted organisations.